Hallo,
Wo ist denn der Unterschied?
Ich dachte bisher immer, dass die "passiven" (zweiten, dritten, ...) GAs status-adressen sind.
Wo verhalten sich die den unterschiedlich (in KNX und in HA)?
Gruß,
Hendrik
It is possible to configure passive/listening group addresses for all functions of every KNX platform (except expose and notify). This allows having multiple group addresses to update the state of its function (e.g., the brightness of a light). When group addresses are configured as a list of strings, the first item is the active sending or state-reading address and the rest is registered as passive addresses. This schema behaves like in ETS configuration where the first is the “sending” address and others are just for updating the group object.
If your KNX device provides active state group objects it is advised to use *_state_address instead of passive addresses as it reduces configuration complexity and avoids wrong states (e.g., when channels are logically locked).
If your KNX device provides active state group objects it is advised to use *_state_address instead of passive addresses as it reduces configuration complexity and avoids wrong states (e.g., when channels are logically locked).
Ich dachte bisher immer, dass die "passiven" (zweiten, dritten, ...) GAs status-adressen sind.
Wo verhalten sich die den unterschiedlich (in KNX und in HA)?
Gruß,
Hendrik
Kommentar