Hello,
Electrician has planned over 20 RCD and RCBO devices in the distribution box for my home and I wanted to verify if what he proposes is reasonable, as here in the "Show your distribution" thread, there are usually significantly fewer of them, even for large distributions.
Briefly about the home - it's a one family two story home with 3 bathrooms, underfloor heating using gas, air conditioning with multi-split heat pumps (2 outdoor units), photovoltaics on roof. Home will use KNX as the integration backbone with mix of DALI (CC and phase dimming) and KNX (CV) for light control.
The power lines, which have individual separate RCD/RCBO on them are currently following:
1) sliding outdoor gate;
2) territory lighting - in pavement, on fence, on gate etc;
3) wall sockets on balcony and terrace;
4) functional outdoor lighting at entrance, on balcony and terrace;
5) decorative outdoor lighting on facades;
6) heating and hot water (gas heater, circulation pumps, distribution valves);
7) water pump in well;
8) sockets in garden;
9) sockets+towel rails for each bathroom separately (so 3 RCBO there);
10) light in bathrooms (1 RCBO for all 3);
11) kitchen - fridge;
12) kitchen - induction surface;
13) kitchen - dishwasher/faucet boiler/sink;
14) kitchen - general sockets;
15) laundry - 3 separate RCBOs for washing machine, dryer and sockets;
16) 2 separate RCBOs for each outdoor AC unit, because each of them has a maximum of 20A, so they need to be on different phases to spread the load;
17) ceiling IR heaters on terrace;
19) sprinkler system;
20) ventilation system with heat/humidity recovery.
So that's 26 in total and I have probably forgot something. I can understand his argument, that having these on a separate RCD devices will reduce the problems and chance of them tripping if there is a fault, and developing fault in one of them will not have severe effect on rest of the home. However having so many increase cost because of RCDs themselves, because of larger distribution needed to accommodate all of them and man hours needed to assemble it all.
Is the above separation reasonable, or would the common practice be to group the lines to reduce the amount of RCDs needed?
Also, the country code does not require ALL sockets protected by RCD, so currently indoor wall sockets only have MCBs. However it looks like in Germany it is mandatory, so all the distributions shown here always have RCD on all lines. I assume from safety perspective, it would be better to do that too, even though it is not required by the code just yet?
P.S. Sorry for writing in English
Electrician has planned over 20 RCD and RCBO devices in the distribution box for my home and I wanted to verify if what he proposes is reasonable, as here in the "Show your distribution" thread, there are usually significantly fewer of them, even for large distributions.
Briefly about the home - it's a one family two story home with 3 bathrooms, underfloor heating using gas, air conditioning with multi-split heat pumps (2 outdoor units), photovoltaics on roof. Home will use KNX as the integration backbone with mix of DALI (CC and phase dimming) and KNX (CV) for light control.
The power lines, which have individual separate RCD/RCBO on them are currently following:
1) sliding outdoor gate;
2) territory lighting - in pavement, on fence, on gate etc;
3) wall sockets on balcony and terrace;
4) functional outdoor lighting at entrance, on balcony and terrace;
5) decorative outdoor lighting on facades;
6) heating and hot water (gas heater, circulation pumps, distribution valves);
7) water pump in well;
8) sockets in garden;
9) sockets+towel rails for each bathroom separately (so 3 RCBO there);
10) light in bathrooms (1 RCBO for all 3);
11) kitchen - fridge;
12) kitchen - induction surface;
13) kitchen - dishwasher/faucet boiler/sink;
14) kitchen - general sockets;
15) laundry - 3 separate RCBOs for washing machine, dryer and sockets;
16) 2 separate RCBOs for each outdoor AC unit, because each of them has a maximum of 20A, so they need to be on different phases to spread the load;
17) ceiling IR heaters on terrace;
19) sprinkler system;
20) ventilation system with heat/humidity recovery.
So that's 26 in total and I have probably forgot something. I can understand his argument, that having these on a separate RCD devices will reduce the problems and chance of them tripping if there is a fault, and developing fault in one of them will not have severe effect on rest of the home. However having so many increase cost because of RCDs themselves, because of larger distribution needed to accommodate all of them and man hours needed to assemble it all.
Is the above separation reasonable, or would the common practice be to group the lines to reduce the amount of RCDs needed?
Also, the country code does not require ALL sockets protected by RCD, so currently indoor wall sockets only have MCBs. However it looks like in Germany it is mandatory, so all the distributions shown here always have RCD on all lines. I assume from safety perspective, it would be better to do that too, even though it is not required by the code just yet?
P.S. Sorry for writing in English
Kommentar